3rd and 4th order rainbows

Last evening (11 June 2011) thunderstorms approached my home town Schiffdorf near Bremerhaven in Northern Germany. I went to a field road by car to take some photos of the storm clouds. Just after I had arrived (about 18:00 UTC), heavy rain started which lasted for nearly 20 minutes. To my disappointment, the rain covered the gust front and most of the interesting features of the storm. So I waited and hoped that the sun would come out soon and produce some nice rainbows. When it did I realized that the dark clouds covered the sky to the right of the Sun – just the situation Michael Großmann had had when he took the the first image of a 3rd order rainbow only four weeks ago. I decided to try this out as well. Instead of one image I took sequences of five to stack them and, thus, increase the signal-to-noise ratio. I hoped this would increase my chances to detect the 3rd order bow. I took the images from my car through the open window to protect my camera (Canon 40D) from the rain. Visually, I did not see a 3rd order rainbow. However, in my back, the 1st and 2nd order bow developed nicely.

Back home I converted the raw images to 16-bit-Tiff and stacked them in Photoshop. Adjusting saturation already showed the 3rd order bow in the image sequences taken between 18:17 and 18:22 UTC (first image).  Applying unsharp masking revealed something unexpected in one of the stacked images (from 18:19 UTC): There seemed to be another rainbow close to the 3rd order bow, but, with reversed colors (second image). I checked Les Cowley’s website and realized that my image likely showed the 4th order rainbow!

After some more sophisticated processing including denoising (Neat Image), unsharp masking and increasing saturation, the 3rd and 4th order rainbows both were clearly visible. Finally, I created a composite using masks to retain the natural look of the foreground while still showing the 3rd and 4th order rainbows (third image).

Author:  Michael Theusner, Bremerhaven, Germany

About these ads

Posted on June 12, 2011, in observations, rainbow and fogbow and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 16 Comments.

  1. Hard to believe that soon after that former one here’s another wonder!!! Huge congratulation to Michael!!!!

  2. Congrats to both Michael’s. I have been thinking that the third is just theoretical curiosity and and even more so the fourth. Amazing captures!

  3. David Johnson

    Superb. And so soon after the earlier capture of the tertiary.

  4. Great images, Michael!! Impressive 3rd and 4th rainbows observed under excellent conditions.

  5. Edward Olszewski

    I would really like to hear what Les Cowley, Marko Riikonen, Claudia Hinz, Walter Tape, etc. have
    to say about this. In my workplace there are some real doubters of both the 3rd-4th-rainbow picture
    and the 3rd-only earlier rainbow picture.

  6. I never seen a real picture of naturally rainbow higher order before. All known pictures are from handmade experiments.

    Congratulation again Michael & Michael! I’m thunderstrack …

  7. Dear Michael Theusner,

    I’m a science journalist with Intermediair magazine, a Dutch weekly about career, work, politics, economics, science and technology (180 thousand readers, see http://www.intermediair.nl/magazine). I read about your first photo’s of a 3rd and 4th order rainbow, and I would love to use one of them for our weekly science image feature in the magazine, after a short interview with you, and providing proper credit.
    Of course I could send you a paper copy. Could I call you some time soon? Thanks

    kind regards,
    Bruno van Wayenburg
    bruno@xs4all.nl/bruno.van.wayenburg@intermediair.nl

  8. mark riikonen

    Somehow my earlier comment appeared only as “Submoon”
    Of course extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence. But these seemed convincing enough for me. They do not look like jpg artefacts or lens reflections. Of course, it would be nice to see an exacting simulation made in the same view of field as in the photos. The way we do with halo displays.
    Marko Riikonen

  9. @Mr. Olszewski
    —————————-
    I don’t quite get the message about your colleagues’ (and your?) doubts…

    We know both Michael Theusner and Michael Großmann as expert and (self-)critical sky photographers, the latter haven often been featured in Spaceweather, EPOD and other blogs. Anyone who doubts these guys or wants to imply that there has been manipulations in their photographs, has a personal problem with enviousness.

    Elmar Schmidt

  10. marko riikonen

    Nothing wrong with arising doubts. To get convinced, I prefer hard data, not stories about someone’s reputation. We have not seen any measurement or simulations, so this all is still resting on a shaky ground.

  11. Hello Marco,

    i undertand your comment about the “shaky ground”. But in a few day i insert a pdf-file about the measuremants in my posting (naturaly tertiary 3rd order rainbow) and then i hope that the posting from me an Michael Theusner is credible.

    Best regards
    Michael Großmann

  12. Elmar Schmidt

    Hi Marko,

    as a matter of fact, Mr. Olszewskis comment estrangingly ranted about doubting their reputation, not yours

    Michael G’s rainbow photograph has been registered with a starfield by rainbow expert A. Haußmann, and he determined the bow to exactly fit in between the angular range from 39 degrees to 42 degrees. The errors are well under 0,5 degrees.

    So, what else should be calculated or simulated now?

    Good luck for getting the first one in Finland!

    Elmar

  13. Well, having looked at Les’s simulations
    http://www.atoptics.co.uk/rainbows/ord34.htm
    I seem to get in more doubt and it looks like you can’t get me convinced, Elmar. Guess it takes to get one myself before I find peace.

  14. Its true, I already took such photos over 7 years ago, my pictures and negatives were stolen…

    You can take that with ISO 2000 film on a 35 mm camera.

    I also told people at work and friends and nobody believe me…

    I also know the conditions that lead to multiple Rainbows,
    the US meterologist that said it was possible does not understand fully how they are created!!!

    Note than till 2010 the Royal Academy of Science said more than a double Rainbow
    was a myth and could not be verified.

    I understand the process that creates such phenomenon,
    more than 4 Rainbows are possible…

  1. Pingback: Photography Firsts: Fourth-Order Rainbow

  2. Pingback: The first photographic recording of a quaternary rainbow | Quantum Optics Lab Olomouc

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 47 other followers

%d bloggers like this: